Back in March 2009 I made a blog post about the use of CW skimmer software during dxpeditions. My original blog post is here
Today, I was contacted by several members of the ZL7T dxpedition about this blog post. My only intent of this blog post was to get discussion going about the use CW skimmer type software at a time when this software was relativly new. The post was NOT a attack on the ZL7T dxpedition who I thought did an admirable job, but only an attempt to get discussion about cw skimmer software. I gathered my information from the ZL7T website here which was apparently not clear enough that their screenshots of the Spectrum Laboratory software were not made from the dxpedition site, but at a pilot station ZL2IFB on the mainland of NZ used the software to monitor the pileups. I offered the ZL7T team my heartfelt apologies and as I promised them in my e-mail responses, I am going to post their comments to me verbatim so that there are no futhur misunderstandings. 73, Jack K4SAC
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
My verbatim reply to them:
I apologize if my blog post offended you. It certainly was not meant to be “slander” or “insulting” but just a discussion point on a new type of software and its use during a dxpedition.
I was contacted by Mark Sullivan and I approved his comments as I will the other operators from your team even given the rude comments I have received even though the copy on your own web site http://www.zl7t.com/html/off_air.html reads as if the team was using the Spectrum Laboratory software during the dxpedition.
You and your team did an excellent job and if I mis-represented your effort, I sincerely apologize and hope that you and your team will accept my heartfelt apologies.
My only interest was to get conversation going about the new (new at the time) skimmer type software and it’s use during dxpeditions , not in personally attacking you or your team.
As I told Mark, I am editing the blog post to include all of your comments in the interest of fairness as I wasn’t attacking your or your team at all. I thought you guys did a remarkable job.
Again my sincere and heartfelt apologies to the whole ZL7T team.
73, Jack K4SAC
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
“I have just come across your blog entry. As a member of the ZL7T dxpedition I would like to point out that we did not use any Skimmer type or any other software to aid in managing pileups. It was all done by the computer between the ops ears. Those images were generated by our webmaster Gary Zl2IFB from his QTH in New Zealand.”
Regards
Mark Sullivan ZL3AB
———————————————————————————————————————————————————————
As one of the organisers of the ZL7T dxpedition I can assure k4sac and everyone else that the comments regarding skimmer or other software type pileup operating aids used on this dxpedition are just like a full toilet ZL2AAA
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
ZL7T did not use any such “skimmer software”… But as the Pilot station for ZL7T and I was able to filter messages to the team on the Islands, pass the important on to the team. I also fielded dozens of requests about not being in the log etc. Propagation reports, cluster spots…all done with computers via the internet. QSOs were loaded up to the ARRL Log of the World..so this is not “Dxpedition Computer enhancement”? The fact that most of the call signs logged gained the “spot” from their computer… Is there not a computer in every modern “ham shack”? Do you really want to go back down memory lane, and have only paper logs only for DXpedtions? Get real and grow up I say-Duncan McMahon
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Hi guys n galls. I was also a member of the ZL7T DXpedition and can confirm as Mark says, we did not use any electronic skimmer. The CW ops (Both named John) had an inbuilt skimmer between the ears far superior to any electronic item. The frames shown are from our ZL7T web site and were generated in New Zealand and put on the site just for interest.
However, I would see no problem with using an electronic skimmer to speed up the qso rate.
Pse go to our web site and read up on the freindly DXpedition that suceeded in getting many non DXers on the air as well as satifying the serious DXers.
Mike ZL2CC
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Hi Jack,
Your uplifting comments about the ZL7T operation have been bought to my attention. They are totally unfounded and untrue, as one of the CW operators of the DXpedition I find your blog insulting and totally lacking any ham spirit.
73 John ZL1BYZ.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
Jack… You are incorrect. CW Skimmer was never used at ZL7T. Our Pilot Gary, ZL2IFB on the mainland of NZ used it to monitor some of our pileups and he was 550 miles away and not on Chatham. The graphics were reproduced for our website and writeup after we returned. It would be nice if you corrected your error in your blog.
73, Lee Jennings ZL2AL
ZL7T DXpedition leader